From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: "block_dump, bd" in debugfs Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:51:13 -0400 Message-ID: <51CC6D81.4040105@redhat.com> References: <20130627030513.217820@gmx.com> <51CBB405.2080401@redhat.com> <87d2r83xf1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Dokos Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59594 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752165Ab3F0QvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:51:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d2r83xf1.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/27/13 2:00 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Eric Sandeen writes: > >> On 6/26/13 11:05 PM, jon ernst wrote: >> ... >>> Also at the beginning of each line. The output pattern is "0000, >>> 0020, 0040, 0060, 0100, 0120", where are numbers such as"0080,"? >> >> Identical lines are suppressed, similar to what hexdump does by >> default. You might have had a "*" in between? >> > > Offsets are octal, so there is no 0080: adding octal 020 to > octal 0060 gets you to octal 0100. > Oh right, that too. :) Thanks. -Eric