From: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ext4: Fix overflows in ext4 code Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:15:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1369829133-4307-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <51DC1AC5.8010809@redhat.com> <20130709143855.GF6000@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Eric Sandeen , Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Greg KH To: "Theodore Ts'o" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130709143855.GF6000@thunk.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> I don't think these did get cc'd to stable. Was there a reason for that, >> or was it an oversight? > > It was an oversight; my fault, sorry. I'll send a request to the > stable kernel tree for the following patches: > > 8af8eec ext4: fix overflow when counting used blocks on 32-bit architectures > a60697f ext4: fix data offset overflow in ext4_xattr_fiemap() on 32-bit archs > e7293fd ext4: fix overflows in SEEK_HOLE, SEEK_DATA implementations > eaf3793 ext4: fix data offset overflow on 32-bit archs in ext4_inline_data_fiemap() Greg, are these 4 commits part of the large pile you're sitting on right now? Just want to make sure the request wasn't missed, as they lack the CC to stable. josh