From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: e2fsprogs - possible regression between 1.42.7 and 1.42.8 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:40:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20130729144033.GA11816@thunk.org> References: <20130729083941.GG28871@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Nikola Ciprich Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:37012 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756350Ab3G2PYz (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:24:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130729083941.GG28871@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:39:41AM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > trying to compile latest e2fsprogs and running check under RHEL6-compatible > distro (centos) fails: > > r_1024_small_bg: ext2 1024 blocksize with small block groups: failed > r_ext4_small_bg: ext4 1024 blocksize with small block groups: failed > > dunno whether this is known issue... will bisect help? What platform are you running this on? X86? I generally do a full regression test run before I do an e2fsprogs release, so it may very well be something which might be platform or compiler specific. Can you send me the r_1024_small_bg.failed and r_ext4_small_bg.failed files? Thanks, - Ted