From: Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ext4: increase mbcache scalability Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:35:05 -0600 Message-ID: <52405FA9.1010701@hp.com> References: <52309F27.8060008@redhat.com> <5230D739.9010109@redhat.com> <20130911212523.GE13397@thunk.org> <5230D450.7000609@hp.com> <20130912122317.GC12918@thunk.org> <5232FF3E.7080604@hp.com> <5233609F.7060303@redhat.com> <523886CE.2070203@hp.com> <5239B65E.4060202@redhat.com> <20130921185304.GB8606@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Sandeen , Andreas Dilger , T Makphaibulchoke , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List" , aswin@hp.com, aswin_proj@lists.hp.com To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:27188 "EHLO g4t0016.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752787Ab3IWVi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:38:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130921185304.GB8606@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/21/2013 12:53 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Mak, did you mean a ext4 file system created on a ramdisk, using a > /dev/ramNN device, or the literal "ramfs" file system? > > I assume the former, right? > > - Ted > Yes Ted, that is correct, the filesystem using /dev/ramNN. Thanks, Mak.