From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/31] e2fsprogs: Less critical fixes to use the appropriate blk*t types Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:59:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20131007135917.GJ4540@thunk.org> References: <20131001012642.28415.89353.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20131001012805.28415.80896.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:43106 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754335Ab3JGN7U (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:59:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131001012805.28415.80896.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:28:05PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > More fixing of places where raw data types (int, long, etc.) stood in for blk_t > and blk64_t. Also fix some sites where we should probably be using blk64_t. > These fixes aren't as critical as the previous patch. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Applied with the final commit description change: Author: Darrick J. Wong Date: Mon Oct 7 09:57:36 2013 -0400 e2fsprogs: fix inode and block relocation functions to use blk64_t The inode and block relocation functions aren't currently compiled in (so we don't need to worry about breaking ABI compatibility). They were originally intended for use by resize2fs, but we never ended up using them, so (wisely) they weren't ever included in libext2fs as an exported interface (they're not even compiled by the Makefile). Fix them so that in case we ever use them, so that in places where raw data types (int, long, etc.) stood in for blk_t and blk64_t. Also fix some sites where we should probably be using blk64_t. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" - Ted