From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/31] tune2fs: Don't convert block # to cluster # when clearing uninit_bg Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:26:02 -0400 Message-ID: <20131010002602.GA7035@thunk.org> References: <20131001012642.28415.89353.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20131001012649.28415.17225.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20131003190444.GA14971@birch.djwong.org> <20131007130328.GA4540@thunk.org> <20131009221028.GN6860@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoQ==?= Czerner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:44321 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754088Ab3JJA0K (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:26:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131009221028.GN6860@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:10:28PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Any thoughts on patch #1? It fixes bugs in the recently-landed patch "tune2fs: > zero inode table when removing checksums". I haven't gotten to it yet since I've been focusing on patches which apply to the maint branch (i.e., for a 1.42.x release). The metadata checksum patches are on the master/next branch, which will be for an eventual 1.43 release. What I plan to do is to get all or most of the changes which are appropriate for the maint branch applied. I'll then merge the maint branch into the next branch, and then start applying the patches which are specific for a future 1.43 release. Cheers, - Ted