From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: fix build w/o quota Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:20:48 -0200 Message-ID: <20131024132047.GB27701@orion.maiolino.org> References: <52615CC0.7010007@redhat.com> <20131023125147.GA31449@orion.maiolino.org> <20131023152251.GC21448@thunk.org> <5267F952.5040402@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: ext4 development Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62682 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754544Ab3JXNUx (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:20:53 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9ODKq3L024374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:20:53 -0400 Received: from orion.maiolino.org (ovpn-113-27.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.27]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9ODKnrA000585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:20:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5267F952.5040402@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:29:06AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 10/23/13 10:22 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:51:48AM -0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > >> Hey Eric, > >> > >> I did a test here building the e2fsprogs -next tree without quota support and I > >> didn't have any problems configuring and compiling it. Can you share the test > >> you did and failed? > >> > > > > I've been able to replicate the problem. You may need to rm -rf your > > build directory and then run from scratch to see it. > > yes, make clean doesn't remove it, even git clean doesn't; it's in > .gitignore (why?) > Yes, that's why it wasn't failing :) Thanks guys > > Sorry for not responding sooner; I'm in Edinburgh this week and in > > conference mode. > > no problem, I guess that's why I asked :) > > > The reason why we have continud building libquota even when libsupport > > is not defined is because the plan is to rename libquota to libsupport > > once 1.42.x is released. Libquota/libsupport is desinged to never be > > built as a shared library, and the idea is to move things like > > e2fsck/profile.c which is used by e2fsck and mke2fs, into libsupport. > > The rational for that is that the functions in libquota are already > > horribly e2fsprogs specific and aren't really set up to be usable as a > > generic quota support library. So we might as well make it be a > > standardized place for internal support functions used by multiple > > e2fsprogs programs. > > > > I'll try to find a fix that minimizes deltas between the maint branch > > and the next branch. > > Maybe just revert part of "quota: fix disabling quota, add quota tests" ? > > Did that actually do more good than harm? > > -Eric > > > Cheers, > > > > - Ted > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Carlos