From: Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] fs: make posix_acl_chmod more useful Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:07:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <389888733.69110.1386875240679.JavaMail.zimbra@linbit.com> References: <20131211104243.148113893@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131211104527.223923019@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jan Kara , Mark Fasheh , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Joel Becker To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131211104527.223923019@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Christoph, > +int > +posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode) > +{ > + struct posix_acl *acl; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_op->set_acl) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; Symlinks never have get_acl callbacks, so I would remove the S_ISLNK() check here. Andreas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs