From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] fs: make posix_acl_chmod more useful Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:05:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20131212210502.GB27686@infradead.org> References: <20131211104243.148113893@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131211104527.223923019@bombadil.infradead.org> <389888733.69110.1386875240679.JavaMail.zimbra@linbit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jan Kara , Mark Fasheh , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Christoph Hellwig , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Joel Becker To: Andreas Gruenbacher Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <389888733.69110.1386875240679.JavaMail.zimbra@linbit.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+gldm-linux-mtd-36=gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:07:20PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Christoph, > > > +int > > +posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode) > > +{ > > + struct posix_acl *acl; > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_op->set_acl) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > Symlinks never have get_acl callbacks, so I would remove the S_ISLNK() check here. Yeah, will simplify it. Same for the other places where we have both checks. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/