From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/74] e2fsck: try implied cluster allocation when expanding a dir Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:56:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20131216045603.GI28536@thunk.org> References: <20131211011813.30655.39624.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20131211012327.30655.58116.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:40379 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752401Ab3LPE4F (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:56:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131211012327.30655.58116.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:23:27PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > When we're expanding a directory, check to see if we're doing an > implied cluster allocation; if so, we don't need to allocate a new > block, and we certainly don't need to update the summary counts. > > Reported-by: Zheng Liu > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Thanks, applied. - Ted