From: Fabian Frederick Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ext2: Add __init macro to init_inodecache Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 18:19:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20140201181939.c38e6f99592e08bd46e30c5c@skynet.be> References: <20140201160202.a3ac96c613754013300b462d@skynet.be> <20140201175334.GJ20939@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Return-path: Received: from mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.179]:39539 "EHLO mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933256AbaBASS0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:18:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140201175334.GJ20939@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:53:34 -0700 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 04:02:02PM +0800, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > init_inodecache is only called by __init init_ext2_fs. > > Looks like this is true for the majority of filesystems. Would you care > to submit more patches? :-) No problem ! Is it better to send separate patches like this one or one patch for all filesystems ? > > -- > Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre > "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this > operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such > a retrograde step."