From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: Create single function for testing xfs_io commands Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:40:59 -0600 Message-ID: <5310BC1B.4010700@sandeen.net> References: <1393603865-26198-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Lukas Czerner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1393603865-26198-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 2/28/14, 10:10 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Currently there are several function testing various xfs_io commands. > This commit creates _require_xfs_io_command() to test any xfs_command. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner Nice, So to be clear, is the difference here that the explicitly listed commands also ensure that the running kernel supports it, whereas the default simply makes sure that xfs_io accepts it? I suppose it's self-explanatory. Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen > --- > common/rc | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc > index f2c3c3a..7f530d0 100644 > --- a/common/rc > +++ b/common/rc > @@ -1296,12 +1296,43 @@ _user_do() > fi > } > > +_require_xfs_io_command() > +{ > + if [ $# -ne 1 ] > + then > + echo "Usage: _require_xfs_io_command command" 1>&2 > + exit 1 > + fi > + command=$1 > + > + testfile=$TEST_DIR/$$.xfs_io > + case $command in > + "falloc" ) > + testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "falloc 0 1m" $testfile 2>&1` > + ;; > + "fpunch" | "fcollapse" | "zero" ) > + testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "pwrite 0 20k" -c "fsync" \ > + -c "$command 4k 8k" $testfile 2>&1` > + ;; > + "fiemap") > + testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "pwrite 0 20k" -c "fsync" \ > + -c "fiemap -v" $testfile 2>&1` > + ;; > + *) > + testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -c "$command help" 2>&1` > + esac > + > + rm -f $testfile 2>&1 > /dev/null > + echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \ > + _notrun "xfs_io $command support is missing" > + echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \ > + _notrun "xfs_io $command failed (old kernel/wrong fs?)" > +} > + > # check that xfs_io, kernel, and filesystem all support zero > _require_xfs_io_zero() > { > - testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -c "zero help" 2>&1` > - echo $testio | grep -q 'command "zero" not found' && \ > - _notrun "zero command not supported" > + _require_xfs_io_command "zero" > } Nice, so now this actually *does* test the 2nd and 3rd items. :) > # check that xfs_io, glibc, kernel, and filesystem all (!) support > @@ -1309,54 +1340,27 @@ _require_xfs_io_zero() > # > _require_xfs_io_falloc() > { > - testfile=$TEST_DIR/$$.falloc > - testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "falloc 0 1m" $testfile 2>&1` > - rm -f $testfile 2>&1 > /dev/null > - echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fallocate support is missing" > - echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fallocate command failed (old kernel/wrong fs?)" > + _require_xfs_io_command "falloc" > } > > # check that xfs_io, kernel and filesystem all support fallocate with hole > # punching > _require_xfs_io_falloc_punch() > { > - testfile=$TEST_DIR/$$.falloc > - testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "pwrite 0 20k" -c "fsync" \ > - -c "fpunch 4k 8k" $testfile 2>&1` > - rm -f $testfile 2>&1 > /dev/null > - echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fallocate punch support is missing" > - echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fallocate punch command failed (no fs support?)" > + _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" > } > > # check that xfs_io, kernel and filesystem all support fallocate with collapse > # range > _require_xfs_io_falloc_collapse() > { > - testfile=$TEST_DIR/$$.falloc > - testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 20k" -c "fsync" \ > - -c "fcollapse 4k 8k" $testfile 2>&1` > - rm -f $testfile 2>&1 > /dev/null > - echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fallocate collapse range support is missing" > - echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fallocate collapse range failed (no fs support?)" > + _require_xfs_io_command "fcollapse" > } > > # check that xfs_io, kernel and filesystem support fiemap > _require_xfs_io_fiemap() > { > - testfile=$TEST_DIR/$$.fiemap > - testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "pwrite 0 20k" -c "fsync" \ > - -c "fiemap -v" $testfile 2>&1` > - rm -f $testfile 2>&1 > /dev/null > - echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fiemap support is missing" > - echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \ > - _notrun "xfs_io fiemap command failed (no fs support?)" > + _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap" > } > > # Check that a fs has enough free space (in 1024b blocks) > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs