From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: kill i_version support for Hurd-castrated file systems Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:10:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20140320081048.GA21164@infradead.org> References: <20140319202009.GA21361@jessie01> <1395290051-25682-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <3DF297F8-04E0-4EE6-8CD5-127997293D5A@dilger.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Ext4 Developers List , "1o5g4r8o@gmail.com" <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>, "738758@bugs.debian.org" <738758@bugs.debian.org> To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:35014 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753557AbaCTIKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:10:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DF297F8-04E0-4EE6-8CD5-127997293D5A@dilger.ca> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Probably worthwhile to make those !EXT4_OS_HURD checks likely()? Does it make sense to support the format at all given that it's unlikely to get any testing?