From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Bug#738758: [PATCH] ext4: optimize Hurd tests when reading/writing inodes Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:11:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20140321171114.GA5601@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> References: <20140321143927.GA31179@thunk.org> <1395420533-20103-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Reply-To: Samuel Thibault , 738758@bugs.debian.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: 738758@bugs.debian.org, Ext4 Developers List Return-path: Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1395420533-20103-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> List-URL: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Theodore Ts'o, le Fri 21 Mar 2014 12:48:53 -0400, a =E9crit : > Also, add a sanity check to make sure the 64-bit feature is not set > for Hurd file systems, since i_file_acl_high conflicts with a > Hurd-specific field. This is not a big deal, since Hurd doesn't > support file systems larger than 1GB[1] anyway. Err, it does. We regularly use volumes with dozens of GiB. > [1] http://walfield.org/pub/people/neal/papers/hurd-faq/FAQ.en.html#q2-= 6 That faq is very largely outdated. See the official faq on=20 http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/faq.html Samuel --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian= .org