From: Miklos Szeredi Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 changes for 3.15 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:15:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20140403191558.GA8745@thunk.org> <20140404035308.GC2525@thunk.org> <20140404134429.GB26806@quack.suse.cz> <20140404234358.GE10275@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:42356 "EHLO mail-qa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754821AbaDGNPh (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:15:37 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id w8so5773665qac.26 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 06:15:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140404234358.GE10275@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:16:25PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139523745403081&w=2 > > I tried applying this patch on top of xfstests commit 3948694eb1, but > running on ext4.git's test branch, which has the your cross-rename > patches applied: > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/commit/?h=test&id=b7bcc46d4f80139930c2e6bd04ff8ebbff121bc9 > > I see the following: > > BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block Fri Apr 4 23:21:50 UTC 2014 > Device: /dev/vdb > mk2fs options: -q > mount options: -o block_validity > FSTYP -- ext4 > PLATFORM -- Linux/i686 candygram 3.14.0-00061-gb7bcc46 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -q /dev/vdc > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o block_validity /dev/vdc /vdc > > generic/323 [23:22:03] [23:22:04] [not run] > generic/323 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall > generic/324 [23:22:04] [23:22:05] [not run] > generic/324 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall > generic/325 [23:22:05] [23:22:06] [not run] > generic/325 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall > Not run: generic/323 generic/324 generic/325 > > Is there anything obvious that I might be doing wrong? I only wired up the syscall for x86_64. Who's responsible for adding all the syscall tables for the various architectures? Thanks, Miklos