From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 changes for 3.15 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:07:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20140407140745.GA8855@thunk.org> References: <20140403191558.GA8745@thunk.org> <20140404035308.GC2525@thunk.org> <20140404134429.GB26806@quack.suse.cz> <20140404234358.GE10275@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:15:36PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > Is there anything obvious that I might be doing wrong? > > I only wired up the syscall for x86_64. Who's responsible for adding > all the syscall tables for the various architectures? Ah, and I was testing with i386, not x86_64, so that it explains that. It's been quite a while since I've worked to add a new system call, but my impressure is that in general the person who creates the new system call needs to reach out to the architecture maintainers (preferably with a patch :-), since otherwise the architecture maintainers would have no idea that a new syscall has been added. - Ted