From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 changes for 3.15 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:40:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20140403191558.GA8745@thunk.org> <20140404035308.GC2525@thunk.org> <20140404134429.GB26806@quack.suse.cz> <20140404234358.GE10275@thunk.org> <20140407140745.GA8855@thunk.org> <20140408134740.GB28822@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro To: "Theodore Ts'o" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arnd Bergmann , Sam Ravnborg , linux-kbuild Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140408134740.GB28822@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > maintainers would have no idea that a new syscall has been added. >> >> If i386 has the new syscall, scripts/checksyscalls.sh will catch it and >> inform us about it during our next kernel build. >> >> If you add it to x86_64 only, bad luck for anyone else ;-) > > Maybe we should change scripts/checksyscalls.sh to check the x86_64 > list of syscalls, and not i386? > > It's been a long time since "all the world's an i386" --- these days, > it's "all the world's an x86_64". :-) Let the kbuild people (and their employers) fight over it... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds