From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6][RFC] Introduce FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:36:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20140416063618.GA12498@infradead.org> References: <1392649703-10772-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Michael Kerrisk , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Lukas Czerner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1392649703-10772-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:08:17PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Introduce new FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate. This has the same > functionality as xfs ioctl XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE. Lukas, can you please also send a man page update for FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE now that is has been merged? > > It can be used to convert a range of file to zeros preferably without > issuing data IO. Blocks should be preallocated for the regions that span > holes in the file, and the entire range is preferable converted to > unwritten extents - even though file system may choose to zero out the > extent or do whatever which will result in reading zeros from the range > while the range remains allocated for the file. > > This can be also used to preallocate blocks past EOF in the same way as > with fallocate. Flag FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE which should cause the inode > size to remain the same. > > You can test this feature yourself using xfstests, of fallocate(1) however > you'll need patches for util_linux, xfsprogs and xfstests which you > can find here: > > http://people.redhat.com/lczerner/zero_range/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs