From: Tyler Hicks Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:50:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20140514165048.GA20454@boyd> References: <53738316.20601@redhat.com> <53738597.70305@fb.com> <20140514160447.GA3974@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Cc: Chris Mason , Eric Sandeen , =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoQ==?= Czerner , dchinner@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: tytso@mit.edu Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:34076 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754352AbaENQvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 12:51:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140514160447.GA3974@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-05-14 16:04:47, tytso@mit.edu wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > >> linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I > > >> think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. >=20 > I'm personally in favor of using linux-fsdevel since it might > encourage more fs developers who aren't using xfstests yet to start > using it. >=20 > For example, we started investigating using xfstests to test unionfs, > and pretty quickly found problems. (I suspect the same problem exists > in AUFS, BTW, but I've been focusing on unionfs because it's simpler > and less scary.) The patches to enable the use of xfstests to test > unionfs are still pretty rough, but hopefully we'll get those sent to > Dave once they are cleaned up a bit. Oh, that sounds interesting. I haven't seen these patches, but I expect they would be pretty easy for me to extend for testing eCryptfs. That has been on my todo list for a long time but I haven't spent much time working on eCryptfs lately. BTW, you can use this email as a supporting data point for your first paragraph. :) Tyler --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTc57oAAoJENaSAD2qAscKHiQP/jMiLT4iqu2Fovh9zqIInjpe tlw+SIdM5e9/s/mG9Gys706Ktvy/LyDAkYcBCNVePu5VlV6BTrXIlkkJwaW2F4wB zzLm02xzPzq5Z+xnWRpNcscmEz68rzA2ciFVd1PuOqw1TscTNVmfoUUAsMXXUZgv SD7M43OBHql0mTdPX65xmT2HhyYhnaL2KU1qqRvWcNT1MIuVIJ9GbkrD8sH2GzVn cM9yvgEIopbijtuLlCTxXIwzPTFZq3oVcX9awEr0Tx1tVB7qM7Bw0OK+jt/wRpDH NO0KCxGYqs7R223W1E9/pvzFs+A50n9rQihtoZEoieb6u4S/zMhmaSXTT2spOyoJ t9AkeUJLITrFyzE9V7z3KIumC9de7s1VwhYCx/CjLM+ASVPx19kCH0CnmRapiO6v zEMTabX23QV6noOI0C8CHpQ8ludLsUwbTKWpLYL6Z0qLCJeBwsVxXOlelDeKO0/6 yD998a6K9ziuJOGg4KjpGuur0QavFApt33D0c7tlRngFv/zT9pUxRSiSD0hjv2yl vKm7uz60I4OOa6b31OYZrg9S4/0vTOyr1R6PEuBd7Jp8aQ/teUOz1mC7n/nnWlew 2BY8jZZRM3AVRI/Uq+K1axMjwgNUW9Zght1Px4Bd/zszE5yONro8MX18rkTf9HNL uOmxQlf/VmP0cMFUXd+D =+lOS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--