From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 07:46:01 +1000 Message-ID: <20140514214601.GU26353@dastard> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: dchinner@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoQ==?= Czerner Return-path: Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.143]:47562 "EHLO ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751779AbaENVqE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 17:46:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:20:24PM +0200, Luk=C3=A1=C5=A1 Czerner wrote= : > Hi Dave, >=20 > I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate > mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and > even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks > are definitely interested in the development process, but not > everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the > xfs@oss.sgi.com list. >=20 > To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests > patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder > unfortunately. >=20 > linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I > think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. Makes sense to me. fstests@vger.kernel.org? Cheers, Dave. --=20 Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html