From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Luk=E1=A8_Czerner?= Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:08:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <53738316.20601@redhat.com> <53738597.70305@fb.com> <20140514160447.GA3974@thunk.org> <20140514213529.GT26353@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-994174893-1400148494=:2112" Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Chris Mason , Eric Sandeen , dchinner@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24570 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039AbaEOKIV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 06:08:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140514213529.GT26353@dastard> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-994174893-1400148494=:2112 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 15 May 2014, Dave Chinner wrote: > Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 07:35:29 +1000 > From: Dave Chinner > To: tytso@mit.edu > Cc: Chris Mason , Eric Sandeen , > Luk?? Czerner , dchinner@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, > linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:04:47PM +0000, tytso@mit.edu wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > >> linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I > > > >> think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. > > > > I'm personally in favor of using linux-fsdevel since it might > > encourage more fs developers who aren't using xfstests yet to start > > using it. > > I'd prefer a separate mailing list - I don't really like the idea of > burying general lists in large amounts of specific topic-related > traffic. That way lies lkml - a dumping ground for everything that > has no stopic-related lists and that results in a very low signal to > noise ratio. Comparitively speaking, -fsdevel has a high SNR, so we > should try to keep it that way. ;) > > That said, I can see the value in sending update/release > announcements to -fsdevel, but I'd prefer to keep all the xfstests > traffic separate. A separate list makes things like archive > searching and patch tracking much simpler.... I agree, having a separate list and sending out update/release announcements to fsdevel sounds like the best solution to me. Thanks! -Lukas > > Cheers, > > Dave. > --8323328-994174893-1400148494=:2112--