From: Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Reduce contention on s_orphan_lock Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:27:14 -0600 Message-ID: <537BE4D2.2010505@hp.com> References: <1400589949-25595-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1400589949-25595-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <537B8693.4000904@hp.com> <20140520210354.GB5686@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ted Tso , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from g4t3426.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.54]:17614 "EHLO g4t3426.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750721AbaETX3T (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2014 19:29:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140520210354.GB5686@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/20/2014 03:03 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > No, I think we are fine in this case. I'm not sure what race you are > exactly thinking of but unmount cannot certainly happen since we have a > reference to active inode in the filesystem. > Thanks for the reply Jan. Yes, you are correct. Sorry I forgot about that. Thanks, Mak.