From: JP Abgrall Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Add support for SFITRIM, an ioctl for secure FITRIM. Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:19:04 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1402625647-31439-1-git-send-email-jpa@google.com> <539A63C1.8010809@redhat.com> <539A6C07.5090904@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Geremy Condra , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:35057 "EHLO mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbaFMDTZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:19:25 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id va2so2345414obc.18 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:19:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <539A6C07.5090904@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/12/14, 10:02 PM, JP Abgrall wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> You're adding a new high-level IOCTL, so let's get a bit more >>> visibility than just linux-ext4; linux-fsdevel cc'd. >> >> Wasn't too sure about that one, because I didn't feel like committing >> to other FSes for now even if they do have FITRIM. >> Will remember to include them. > > You don't need to implement it for other filesystems, but whether or > not this should be a new fs-level ioctl is something worth airing > out on linux-fsdevel. FITRIM/SFITRIM vs FITRIM/EXT4_IOC_SFITRIM ? I don't mind either way.