From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] msync: fix incorrect fstart calculation Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:44:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20140628124421.c499b001.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <006a01cf91fc$5d225170$1766f450$@samsung.com> <20140628191425.GA2162@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Namjae Jeon , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 , =?UTF-8?Q?Luk=C3=A1=C5=A1?= Czerner , "'Matthew Wilcox'" , "'Eric Whitney'" , Ashish Sangwan To: "Theodore Ts'o" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140628191425.GA2162@thunk.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 15:14:25 -0400 "Theodore Ts'o" wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:38:49PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > > Fix a regression caused by Commit 7fc34a62ca mm/msync.c: sync only > > the requested range in msync(). > > xfstests generic/075 fail occured on ext4 data=journal mode because > > the intended range was not syncing due to wrong fstart calculation. > > > > Cc: Matthew Wilcox > > Cc: Luk____ Czerner > > Reported-by: Eric Whitney > > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan > > Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o > > Andrew, do you want to take this in the mm tree, I have done so. > or shall I take it in > the ext4 tree? I would prefer if we could get this pushed to Linus as > soon as possible, since it fixes a regression. Yep, I'll get it over to Linus early next week. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org