From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: Question about e2fsprogs/e4defrag Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:05:46 -0600 Message-ID: References: <53C5FCA5.20207@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140716192236.GA8628@birch.djwong.org> <53C74316.1050902@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140717180908.GB8628@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com" , "t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com" To: Xiaoguang Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:64987 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752976AbaGRCFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2014 22:05:49 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id lf10so4452200pab.30 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:05:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140717180908.GB8628@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This thread for me to thinking that it would be useful if filefrag also printed the "fragmentation score" that e4defrag prints that would make It more clear whether a file should be considered "fragmented" or not, and it helps the user to decide if e4defrag should be run on it. I'm not sure whether this is always printed or only with an option. Cheers, Andreas