From: Gioh Kim Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] fs/buffer.c: allocate buffer cache with user specific flag Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:38:10 +0900 Message-ID: <53F40A12.6040506@lge.com> References: <53F2F3E6.1030901@lge.com> <53F2F436.4070307@lge.com> <20140819130324.GB27553@quack.suse.cz> <53F3DFA3.6040303@lge.com> <20140820021623.GB3271@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim , Joonsoo Kim , =?UTF-8?B?7J206rG07Zi4?= To: Jan Kara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140820021623.GB3271@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org >>>> @@ -1381,12 +1383,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__find_get_block); >>>> struct buffer_head * >>>> __getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size) >>>> { >>>> - struct buffer_head *bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size); >>>> - >>>> - might_sleep(); >>>> - if (bh == NULL) >>>> - bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size); >>>> - return bh; >>>> + return __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, __GFP_MOVABLE); >>>> } >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk); >>> Why did you remove the __find_get_block() call? That looks like a bug. > I'm not sure if you didn't miss this comment.... I'm sorry I missed it. I think calling __find_get_block() in __getblk_gfp() can replace it. I'm not sure about it. If anybody disagree with it, I'll change it as the original code.