From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: define MKFS_EXT4_PROG and use it instead of "mkfs.ext4" / "mkfs -t ext4" Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 22:35:28 +1000 Message-ID: <20140908123528.GK30012@dastard> References: <20140907192110.GC1066@thunk.org> <1410141968-17551-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, eguan@redhat.com To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.131]:6275 "EHLO ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753901AbaIHMfn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:35:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1410141968-17551-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:06:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o > --- > common/config | 1 + > common/rc | 7 +++++-- > tests/btrfs/012 | 1 - > tests/ext4/003 | 2 +- > tests/ext4/306 | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) This throws lots of rejects with all the other patches I've already queued up. Can you rebase it and resend it when I push out my current tree in the morning, Ted? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com