From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: e2fsck not fixing deleted inode referenced errors? Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:54:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20140930195408.GD17142@thunk.org> References: <542AEED4.5050303@bitsync.net> <20140930183012.GA9942@birch.djwong.org> <542AF9B8.2090800@bitsync.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Zlatko Calusic Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:57350 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751142AbaI3TyP (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:54:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <542AF9B8.2090800@bitsync.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:43:04PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > Full error message from the kernel log, together with data check I did in > the evening: > > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr > 0x4010000 action 0xe frozen > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2.00: irq_stat 0x00400040, connection > status changed > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2: SError: { PHYRdyChg DevExch } > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2.00: failed command: FLUSH CACHE EXT > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2.00: cmd > ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0\x0a res > 40/00:f4:e2:7f:14/00:00:3a:00:00/40 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error) > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2.00: status: { DRDY } > Sep 29 05:07:51 atlas kernel: ata2: hard resetting link > Sep 29 05:07:57 atlas kernel: ata2: link is slow to respond, please be > patient (ready=0) > Sep 29 05:08:00 atlas kernel: ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 > SControl 300) > Sep 29 05:08:00 atlas kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 > Sep 29 05:08:00 atlas kernel: ata2.00: retrying FLUSH 0xea Emask 0x10 > Sep 29 05:08:00 atlas kernel: ata2: EH complete That looks really bad; it sounds like you have a hardware error on at least one of your disks. Have you tried running running badblocks on both disks to make sure the disk isn't flagging more bad blocks, and then resynchronizing the RAID 1 array? Then try running e2fsck again. - Ted