From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: BLKZEROOUT + pread should return zeroes, right? Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:02:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20141014030132.GA12013@birch.djwong.org> <20141014042711.GJ5267@dastard> <20141014092128.GA23656@infradead.org> <20141014185753.GA6838@lenny.home.zabbo.net> <20141014202147.GI17506@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Zach Brown , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-ext4 To: Dave Chinner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141014202147.GI17506@dastard> (Dave Chinner's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:21:47 +1100") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Dave" == Dave Chinner writes: Dave> I don't care what happens to the block layer ioctls w.r.t. cache Dave> coherency. If people want to make them fully cache coherent for Dave> buffered IO, go right ahead. Dave> But that doesn't change the fact that if you want your application Dave> to work sanely on existing kernels, then using direct IO is the Dave> only option... Yep! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering