From: Wang Shilong Subject: [PATCH] Ext4: update comments that use ext4_delete_inode() Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:28:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1413811707-2612-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:58793 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750945AbaJTF30 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 01:29:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v10so4279897pde.20 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vm01.localdomain ([223.65.188.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zq13sm8058024pab.44.2014.10.19.22.29.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Wang Shilong ext4_delete_inode() has been renamed for a long time, update comments for this. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/migrate.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index e9777f9..04fd885 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3643,7 +3643,7 @@ out_stop: * If this was a simple ftruncate() and the file will remain alive, * then we need to clear up the orphan record which we created above. * However, if this was a real unlink then we were called by - * ext4_delete_inode(), and we allow that function to clean up the + * ext4_evict_inode(), and we allow that function to clean up the * orphan info for us. */ if (inode->i_nlink) diff --git a/fs/ext4/migrate.c b/fs/ext4/migrate.c index a432634..3cb267a 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/migrate.c +++ b/fs/ext4/migrate.c @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ err_out: /* * set the i_blocks count to zero - * so that the ext4_delete_inode does the + * so that the ext4_evict_inode() does the * right job * * We don't need to take the i_lock because -- 1.8.3.1