From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] [RESEND] Generic defragmentation strategies Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:30:48 -0800 Message-ID: <1421177448.2076.24.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <87wq4q3li0.fsf@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, Theodore Ts'o , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , ext4 development To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:56102 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751004AbbAMTav (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:30:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wq4q3li0.fsf@openvz.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:36 +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Sorry, previous message was refused by lsf-pc@'s spam filter (probably due to gpg > mime signature), this is second attempt. I think I've found and fixed that. All unrecognised mime types (everything except multipart/mixed and multipart/alternative) get rejected. A lot of mail tools have taken to using a new type (multipart/signed) for gpg messages, so I've added that to the acceptable mime types. James