From: Xiaoguang Wang Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix comments in ext4_can_extents_be_merged() Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:11:45 +0800 Message-ID: <1423048305-11335-1-git-send-email-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: , , Xiaoguang Wang To: Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:21232 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbbBDLR5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:17:57 -0500 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Since commit 66369e0, we are allowed to merge unwritten extents, so here these comments are wrong, remove it. Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index bed4308..2e6af88 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -1717,12 +1717,6 @@ ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ex1, { unsigned short ext1_ee_len, ext2_ee_len; - /* - * Make sure that both extents are initialized. We don't merge - * unwritten extents so that we can be sure that end_io code has - * the extent that was written properly split out and conversion to - * initialized is trivial. - */ if (ext4_ext_is_unwritten(ex1) != ext4_ext_is_unwritten(ex2)) return 0; -- 1.8.3.1