From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: noacl Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:05:21 -0500 Message-ID: <55707741.7050700@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tobias Koeck , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40266 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbbFDQFX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:05:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/4/15 10:50 AM, Tobias Koeck wrote: > Hi there, > > is there a reason you want to remove the noacl option? I'll answer your question with a question ;) Is there a reason you want to keep the noacl option? It (and nouser_xattr) were deprecated because extN were the only filesystems which allowed this sort of configuration as a mount option, and it seemed to serve no obvious purpose. -Eric