From: Eric Whitney Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests-bld: exclude ext4 defrag tests from unsupported configurations Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:00:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20150611200051.GA505@localhost.localdomain> References: <20150610181319.GA23530@localhost.localdomain> <20150610192810.GB24181@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Whitney , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from mail-vn0-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:34079 "EHLO mail-vn0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753127AbbFKUAd (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:00:33 -0400 Received: by vnbf7 with SMTP id f7so3339168vnb.1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150610192810.GB24181@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I haven't tried to run generic/068 in quite a while, but do see it's passing now. I'll close the related bugzillas. Do you know which patch fixed this? Thanks, Eric * Theodore Ts'o : > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:13:19PM -0400, Eric Whitney wrote: > > Online defrag is not currently implemented for journaled data and > > bigalloc ext4 file systems. The xfstests that exercise online defrag > > do not verify that the test file system supports that feature before > > executing, resulting in spurious test failures. (In the case of > > ext4/307, the test reports success but actually fails because the > > e4compact test component is ignoring failures.) > > > > For the time being, simply exclude these tests to eliminate the test > > failure noise. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney > > Thanks, applied. BTW, I had since removed data_journal.exclude > because generic/068 should be passing with data journalling enabled. > > - Ted