From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [e2fsprogs] rename configure.in to configure.ac Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:21:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20150620192101.GG29480@thunk.org> References: <1432546352-1855-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20150608145922.GA15795@thunk.org> <20150608155606.GD13517@vapier> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:46621 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755219AbbFTTVD (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:21:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150608155606.GD13517@vapier> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 11:56:06AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 08 Jun 2015 10:59, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 05:32:32AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > Newer versions of autotools have started warning when using the old > > > configure.in name. > > > > Note that I ship a version of configure (and keep one checked in to > > git) because I do not trust the autoconf maintainers' ability to > > maintain backwards compatibility, having gotten badly burned in the > > past. I am currently using autoconf 2.69, and people who try to rerun > > autoconf on some other version of autoconf are venturing into > > unsupported territory. It may work; it may screw up in amazing ways. > > Some autoconf macro may silently assume that some feature is present > > when it is not, or vice versa. > > > > And if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces. :-) > > that's fine, but it doesn't really matter to this patch -- it should be > configure.ac and not configure.in. the version of autoconf you're using > certainly supports the newer name. This patch breaks the automatic rebuild of configure if the configure.ac/configure.in file is modified. I've fixed it up by adding the necessary change to MCONFIG.in. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in