From: Pavel Machek Subject: two fsck.ext4's needed to clean filesystem Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20150722141806.GA21181@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: tytso@mit.edu Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:34989 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933234AbbGVOSI (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! pavel@amd:~/misc$ /sbin/fsck.ext4 -y -f delme ... delme: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** delme: 2054/25064 files (0.1% non-contiguous), 98231/100000 blocks pavel@amd:~/misc$ /sbin/fsck.ext4 -y -f delme e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014) Backing up journal inode block information. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information delme: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** delme: 2054/25064 files (0.5% non-contiguous), 98231/100000 blocks pavel@amd:~/misc$ cp delme.fsck.original-damaged delme.report-1 pavel@amd:~/misc$ /sbin/fsck.ext4 -V e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014) Using EXT2FS Library version 1.42.12, 29-Aug-2014 pavel@amd:~/misc$ Is that considered ok? Should fsck restart itself or report 'filesystem still has errors' in this case? Thanks and best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html