From: Albino B Neto <bino@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 removal, quota & udf fixes
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:28:38 -0300
Message-ID: <CAMu38xLf-b_re4vCFuZP3i6sR5gVZE25Wak4+s1KNd6heSST6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150831061920.GA2751@quack.suse.cz>
	<CA+55aFweA1J+a5MYxgWDOAg0p+UdqfP+Z1aFKs1c8n0hWUiBDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150902165201.GW12432@techsingularity.net>
	<20150902184522.GA10390@birch.djwong.org>
	<CA+55aFy4LZP3_eNq=tBjkbPaVVRuQxuXRXV=+yLsvqzD9jXqyA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFy4LZP3_eNq=tBjkbPaVVRuQxuXRXV=+yLsvqzD9jXqyA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

2015-09-02 20:47 GMT-03:00 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Yes, that would be a bug.
>
> So the thing I'm happy to see is that the ext4 developers seem to
> unanimously agree that maintaining ext3 compatibility is part of their
> job, and nobody seems to be arguing for keeping ext3 around. As long
> as any possible regressions from ext3 removal have a clear "yup, it's
> on us" from the ext4 people,  I don't mind removing it. I was
> expecting ext4 people to not be thrilled about supporting possible
> legacy cases.

Good.

The future of ext4 ? Are you (developers) write other file system ?

-- 
Albino B Neto
www.bino.us
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" faw