From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: xfstests ext4/304 failing due to donor inode's i_size == 0 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:57:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20151019025727.GA6676@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: dmonakhov@openvz.org Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:58140 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752528AbbJSC5a (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:57:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Dmitry, I was investigating why ext4/304 is failing, and it's due to defrag-fuzzer returning an error: defrag-fuzzer: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err=22 (file:ioengines.c:309, func=td_io_que ue, error=Invalid argument): pid=3207: Sun Oct 18 19:43:57 2015 After instrumenting the kernel, it appears that this is due to donor inode's i_size being set to 0. Can you reproduce this faiure? And if it's working for you, what version of fio are you using? I normally use fio 2.1.3, since newer versions of fio have caused test regressions that appear to be caused by fio bugs. I tried fio 2.1.14, it was also failing. I could try using 2.2.x versions of fio, but as I recall, that set of versions was were I started running into other test failures caused by fio bugs. (When I asked Dave Chinner about this a while back, he tod me he was using 2.1.3 because he had run into regressions caused by vio, and I've been sticking with fio 2.1.3 for quite a while now.) Thanks, - Ted