From: Ross Zwisler Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dax: pass bdev argument to dax_clear_blocks() Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 18:44:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20160208014409.GA2343@linux.intel.com> References: <1454829553-29499-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <1454829553-29499-2-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20160207220329.GK31407@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ross Zwisler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Andrew Morton , Dan Williams , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160207220329.GK31407@dastard> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:03:29AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 12:19:12AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > dax_clear_blocks() needs a valid struct block_device and previously it was > > using inode->i_sb->s_bdev in all cases. This is correct for normal inodes > > on mounted ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw > > block devices and for XFS real-time devices. > > > > Instead, have the caller pass in a struct block_device pointer which it > > knows to be correct. > .... > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c > > index 07ef29b..f722ba2 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c > > @@ -73,9 +73,11 @@ xfs_zero_extent( > > xfs_daddr_t sector = xfs_fsb_to_db(ip, start_fsb); > > sector_t block = XFS_BB_TO_FSBT(mp, sector); > > ssize_t size = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, count_fsb); > > + struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip); > > > > if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip))) > > - return dax_clear_blocks(VFS_I(ip), block, size); > > + return dax_clear_blocks(inode, xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(inode), > > + block, size); > > Get rid of the local inode variable and use VFS_I(ip) like the code > originally did. Do not change code that is unrelated to the > modifcation being made, especially when it results in making > the code an inconsistent mess of mixed pointer constructs.... The local 'inode' variable was added to avoid multiple calls for VFS_I() for the same 'ip'. That said, I'm happy to make the change. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org