From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:27:44 +0100 Message-ID: <56C0F150.60008@gmail.com> References: <56B770B6.7040803@gmail.com> <56B77262.7090107@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-ext4 , XFS Developers , lkml , linux-fsdevel , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux API , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , Jeff Layton , Andreas Dilger To: Andreas Gruenbacher Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 02/12/2016 11:25 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I'll probably have quite a few more comments on this page as I get to >> understand RichACLs better. Here's some comments from an initial >> reading. > > thanks a lot for all the feedback to the man-pages. I've more or less > made all the suggested changes but didn't get to adding examples yet > (that's not so easy). > > The changes are here: > > https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl Thanks. I'll send a few further comments. But I hope to send more in the future. >> So, an initial comment. It seems to me to that this page (but >> not setrichacl(1) and getrichacl(1)) should ultimately land in >> man-pages (just like acl(7)), since we're talking about a kernel >> feature. Make sense? > > We could sure move acl(5) and richacl(7) there. We already have acl(5) (now "acl(7)" in man pages) ;-). Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/