From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 09/22] richacl: Permission check algorithm
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:09:47 -0800
Message-ID: <20160311140947.GD14808@infradead.org>
References: <1456733847-17982-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
 <1456733847-17982-10-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1456733847-17982-10-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

>  fs/Makefile             |   2 +-
>  fs/richacl_inode.c      | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What's the point of a tiny separate file here?  All richacls files
together are still small, and it would be much preferably to have all
that code together.