From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 21/22] ext4: Add richacl support
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:02:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU64SzTN23LMzGcPex=jRz_Euwb_CHrW=kX+A5sn8=SFSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1456733847-17982-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
	<1456733847-17982-22-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
	<20160311142719.GG14808@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	XFS Developers <xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel-m1MBpc4rdrD3fQ9qLvQP4Q@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton-vpEMnDpepFuMZCB2o+C8xQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160311142719.GG14808-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> +static inline int
>> +ext4_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode, umode_t mode)
>> +{
>> +     if (IS_RICHACL(inode))
>> +             return richacl_chmod(inode, inode->i_mode);
>> +     return posix_acl_chmod(inode, inode->i_mode);
>> +}
>
> Thi isn't ext4-specific and potentially duplicated in every caller.
> Please provide this as a common helper.

This can go in neither fs.h nor posix_acl.h nor richacl.h unless we
turn it into a macro, and I don't think we want to add a new header
file for such extreme trivia.

> Also while we're at it, the mode argument is ignore and the function
> always uses inode->i_mode instead.

Right, thanks.

Andreas