From: Steve French Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:28:44 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1456733847-17982-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <20160311140134.GA14808@infradead.org> <20160315071103.GC19747@infradead.org> <20160315154514.GB39038@jra3> <20160315201700.GA22945@sernet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Linux NFS Mailing List , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Gruenbacher , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" , Linux API , Trond Myklebust , LKML , XFS Developers , Cristoph Hellwig , Andreas Dilger , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel , Jeff Layton , linux-ext4 , Anna Schumaker , Jeremy Allison To: "Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160315201700.GA22945@sernet.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:45:14AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> > People have long learned that we only have 'alloc' permissions. Any >> > model that mixes allow and deny ACE is a mistake. >> >> People can also learn and change though :-). One of the >> biggest complaints people deploying Samba on Linux have is the >> incompatible ACL models. > > Just to confirm: I see this a lot in the field. NFSv4 ACLs, while not a > perfect match for NTFS ACLs are a lot closer much more usable to people > who want to serve Windows clients. Yes (and presumably Macs as well) -- Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs