From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:44:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20160325104418.GA10525@infradead.org> References: <1458861450-17705-1-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@intel.com> <1458861450-17705-5-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox , Ross Zwisler , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , Jan Kara , Jens Axboe , Al Viro , Andrew Morton To: Vishal Verma Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1458861450-17705-5-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:17:29PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote: > @@ -72,16 +72,7 @@ xfs_zero_extent( > struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount; > xfs_daddr_t sector = xfs_fsb_to_db(ip, start_fsb); > sector_t block = XFS_BB_TO_FSBT(mp, sector); > - ssize_t size = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, count_fsb); > > - if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip))) > - return dax_clear_sectors(xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(VFS_I(ip)), > - sector, size); > - > - /* > - * let the block layer decide on the fastest method of > - * implementing the zeroing. > - */ > return sb_issue_zeroout(mp->m_super, block, count_fsb, GFP_NOFS); While not new: using sb_issue_zeroout in XFS is wrong as it doesn't account for the RT device. We need the xfs_find_bdev_for_inode and call blkdev_issue_zeroout directly with the bdev it returned. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org