From: Baole Ni Subject: [PATCH 1039/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:10:52 +0800 Message-ID: <20160802121052.19381-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, mhalcrow@google.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, oneukum@suse.com To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, david.vrabel@citrix.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index c1ab3ec..12e4da5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG ushort ext4_mballoc_debug __read_mostly; -module_param_named(mballoc_debug, ext4_mballoc_debug, ushort, 0644); +module_param_named(mballoc_debug, ext4_mballoc_debug, ushort, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mballoc_debug, "Debugging level for ext4's mballoc"); #endif -- 2.9.2