From: Ross Zwisler Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ext2: tell DAX the size of allocation holes Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:52:27 -0600 Message-ID: <20160816225227.GA632@linux.intel.com> References: <20160815190918.20672-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20160815190918.20672-2-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20160816091025.GA27284@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Theodore Ts'o , linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, Dave Chinner , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Andreas Dilger , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andrew Morton To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160816091025.GA27284-4I4JzKEfoa/jFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 15-08-16 13:09:12, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > When DAX calls ext2_get_block() and the file offset points to a hole we > > currently don't set bh_result->b_size. When we re-enable PMD faults DAX > > will need bh_result->b_size to tell it the size of the hole so it can > > decide whether to fault in a 4 KiB zero page or a 2 MiB zero page. > > > > For ext2 we always want DAX to use 4 KiB zero pages, so we just tell DAX > > that all holes are 4 KiB in size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler > > --- > > fs/ext2/inode.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c > > index d5c7d09..c6d9763 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c > > @@ -773,6 +773,12 @@ int ext2_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, struct buffer_head *bh_ > > if (ret > 0) { > > bh_result->b_size = (ret << inode->i_blkbits); > > ret = 0; > > + } else if (ret == 0 && IS_DAX(inode)) { > > I'd just drop the IS_DAX() check and set > > bh_result->b_size = 1 << inode->i_blkbits; > > IMO it's better to have things consistent between DAX & !DAX whenever > possible. Agreed, this is better. Fixed for v2, thanks!