From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: DAX can not work on virtual nvdimm device Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:03:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20160909140327.r2j64s5xdaxnnxhx@thunk.org> References: <20160819183047.GA7216@linux.intel.com> <600ac51c-0f61-6e53-9bfa-669c85494d1f@linux.intel.com> <20160829193014.GB16738@linux.intel.com> <61d5c470-a8bf-86d5-d1fe-b4b577a85967@linux.intel.com> <25098f37-53f7-6d5d-0b1a-8469bab51a9f@linux.intel.com> <20160902025738.GA26108@linux.intel.com> <20160906150620.GJ28922@quack2.suse.cz> <20160908204708.GA15167@linux.intel.com> <20160909091925.GF22777@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Yumei Huang , Xiao Guangrong , KVM , "linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" , "qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , LKML , Linux ACPI , Stefan Hajnoczi , linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160909091925.GF22777-4I4JzKEfoa/jFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > 1. make the guest kernel based on your tree, the top commit is > > > > > 10d7902fa0e82b (dax: unmap/truncate on device shutdown) and > > > > > the config file can be found in this thread. What git tree is 10d7902fa0e82b from? > Hum, nothing unusual in there. I've tried reproducing on a local SLE11 SP3 > machine (which is from about the same time) but everything works as > expected there. Shrug... I just tried reproducing it via "gce-xfstests --pmem-device shell" with a downgraded e2fsprogs to stock upstream 1.42.12, and I can't reproduce it with the ext4.git tree. I'm not sure whether the git commit is critical, though. Is this a regression that was working before? Or it's possible that Red Hat did something weird with the CentOS 6 e2fsprogs.... - Ted