From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/9] ext2: tell DAX the size of allocation holes Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 15:55:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160823220419.11717-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20160823220419.11717-3-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20160825075728.GA11235@infradead.org> <20160826212934.GA11265@linux.intel.com> <20160829074116.GA16491@infradead.org> <20160829125741.cdnbb2uaditcmnw2@thunk.org> <20160909164808.GC18554@linux.intel.com> <20160910073012.GA5295@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ross Zwisler , Theodore Ts'o , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" , Dave Chinner , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "Andreas Dilger" , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160910073012.GA5295@infradead.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] > Either way we need to get rid of buffer_heads, and another aop that is en= tirely > caller specific is unaceptable. I finally figured out what you actually meant by this. You mean that inste= ad of having an aop->populate_pfn, you want to define a populate_pfn_t call= back and pass it in. Something like this: int ext2_populate_pfn(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff) { struct iomap iomap; ... return dax_populate_pfn(mapping, pgoff, &iomap); } int ext2_dax_fault(vma, vmf) { ... ret =3D dax_fault(vma, vmf, ext2_populate_pfn); ... } I don't have a problem with that. I'll work up something along those lines= next week. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org