From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: improve ext4lazyinit scalability V2 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:22:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20160915152204.eryra42mtigl5aru@thunk.org> References: <1471263815-26022-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20160815150520.GA22082@quack2.suse.cz> <20160906033954.k22xaasbn26s4wo4@thunk.org> <20160906083608.GB28922@quack2.suse.cz> <87poohcq96.fsf@dmlp.Dlink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:55614 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753342AbcIOPW5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:22:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87poohcq96.fsf@dmlp.Dlink> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:49:09PM +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > ext4_run_li_request() can also update elr->lr_next_sched. So we need to > > update next_wakeup even in progress == 1 case (i.e., I'd leave the update > > of next_wakeup as is in the old code...). Otherwise the patch looks good. > Yes. That is correct. Simply last hank shoul not be deleted. > > Theodore, please fold patch attached to original one. Done, thanks!! - Ted