From: Geliang Tang Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: move more common code into journal_init_common() Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:39:09 +0800 Message-ID: <20160918023909.GA28844@OptiPlex> References: <50f2f9e8f6e503a3bd9a54b4dcb58531e18dbf52.1473240936.git.geliangtang@gmail.com> <20160907131624.GU28922@quack2.suse.cz> <20160915160309.okkvwpxz4im5abti@thunk.org> <20160915195818.q5aa4cc3lrvpsw2m@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , Eric Ren , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:33717 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755464AbcIRCjP (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:39:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160915195818.q5aa4cc3lrvpsw2m@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:58:18PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:03:09PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 03:16:24PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Wed 07-09-16 20:41:13, Geliang Tang wrote: > > > > There are some repetitive code in jbd2_journal_init_dev() and > > > > jbd2_journal_init_inode(). So this patch moves the common code into > > > > journal_init_common() helper to simplify the code. And fix the coding > > > > style warnings reported by checkpatch.pl by the way. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang > > > > > > The patch looks good to me. You can add: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Hi Geiliang, > > This patch is causing a WARN_ON: > > [ 13.923139] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 13.924644] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2534 at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/proc/generic.c:369 __proc_create+0xe1/0x156 > [ 13.926751] name len 0 > [ 13.927283] Modules linked in: > [ 13.927954] CPU: 0 PID: 2534 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 4.8.0-rc4-00139-g52c4278 #685 > [ 13.929809] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Debian-1.8.2-1 04/01/2014 > [ 13.931643] 00000000 00000246 f3c1dd3c c13faa3e f3c1dd68 c11cc9c1 f3c1dd54 c1087d00 > [ 13.933425] 00000171 f4727b0c f3c1ddac f5183bc0 f3c1dd70 c1087d44 00000009 00000000 > [ 13.935199] f3c1dd68 c1969704 f3c1dd84 f3c1dda0 c11cc9c1 c19696d9 00000171 c1969704 > [ 13.936987] Call Trace: > [ 13.937507] [] dump_stack+0x73/0xa5 > [ 13.938438] [] ? __proc_create+0xe1/0x156 > [ 13.939503] [] __warn+0xbc/0xd3 > [ 13.940404] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2d/0x32 > [ 13.941470] [] __proc_create+0xe1/0x156 > [ 13.942461] [] proc_mkdir_data+0x2c/0x6e > [ 13.943484] [] proc_mkdir+0x13/0x15 > [ 13.944425] [] journal_init_common+0x1a8/0x26a > [ 13.945539] [] jbd2_journal_init_inode+0xa9/0xfd > [ 13.946702] [] ext4_fill_super+0x18e5/0x2a92 > [ 13.947794] [] ? bitmap_string.isra.6+0xa9/0xc1 > [ 13.948926] [] mount_bdev+0x114/0x15f > [ 13.950333] [] ext4_mount+0x15/0x17 > [ 13.951985] [] ? ext4_calculate_overhead+0x30e/0x30e > [ 13.954172] [] mount_fs+0x58/0x115 > [ 13.955789] [] vfs_kern_mount+0x4c/0xae > [ 13.957588] [] do_mount+0x6b0/0x8d7 > [ 13.959270] [] ? _copy_from_user+0x44/0x57 > [ 13.961140] [] ? strndup_user+0x31/0x42 > [ 13.962919] [] SyS_mount+0x57/0x7b > [ 13.964609] [] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4d/0x5f > [ 13.966555] [] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f > [ 13.968402] ---[ end trace 2eb7cc6d9a94f309 ]--- > [ 14.017482] EXT4-fs (vdc): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) > > The problem is that journal->j_devname isn't initialized until *after* > journal_init_common(), and it's used by jbd2_stats_proc_init(), which > is called by journal_init_common(). > > To fix it I applied the following fix on top of your patch. > > - Ted > > diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c > index 07e14ef..927da49 100644 > --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c > +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c > @@ -1141,13 +1141,11 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev, > journal->j_fs_dev = fs_dev; > journal->j_blk_offset = start; > journal->j_maxlen = len; > - jbd2_stats_proc_init(journal); > n = journal->j_blocksize / sizeof(journal_block_tag_t); > journal->j_wbufsize = n; > journal->j_wbuf = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(struct buffer_head *), > GFP_KERNEL); > if (!journal->j_wbuf) { > - jbd2_stats_proc_exit(journal); > kfree(journal); > return NULL; > } > @@ -1157,7 +1155,6 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev, > pr_err("%s: Cannot get buffer for journal superblock\n", > __func__); > kfree(journal->j_wbuf); > - jbd2_stats_proc_exit(journal); > kfree(journal); > return NULL; > } > @@ -1202,6 +1199,7 @@ journal_t *jbd2_journal_init_dev(struct block_device *bdev, > > bdevname(journal->j_dev, journal->j_devname); > strreplace(journal->j_devname, '/', '!'); > + jbd2_stats_proc_init(journal); > > return journal; > } > @@ -1241,6 +1239,7 @@ journal_t *jbd2_journal_init_inode(struct inode *inode) > bdevname(journal->j_dev, journal->j_devname); > p = strreplace(journal->j_devname, '/', '!'); > sprintf(p, "-%lu", journal->j_inode->i_ino); > + jbd2_stats_proc_init(journal); > > return journal; > } Thanks Ted, this looks fine to me. -Geliang